Medicare Halts Marketing, New Enrollments by Three Health and Drug Plan Sponsors
Medicare News, Syndicated
Comments Off
Nov 212010
Nov. 21, 2010 - Three Medicare health and drug plan sponsors received sanctions Friday from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for violations of Medicare’s rules and regulations.
Nov. 21, 2010 - Three Medicare health and drug plan sponsors received sanctions Friday from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for violations of Medicare’s rules and regulations. Medication therapy management survey of the prescription drug plans.
Medicare News, Syndicated
Comments Off
Aug 042007
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003), Vol. 46, No. 6. (c 2006), pp. 692-699.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preliminary development and implementation plans for medication therapy management (MTM) services across plan sponsors for the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs) and provide pharmacists with insights for MTM development. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 307 individual contacts from Medicare Advantage or stand-alone PDPs. INTERVENTION: A survey comprising questions about the PDP demographics, plans and implementation, beneficiary eligibility criteria, scope of services, providers of services, and payment structure for MTM services was e-mailed and mailed in November 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and bivariate analysis of survey items. RESULTS: A total of 97 usable surveys were completed, a 31.5% response rate. Almost all respondents had a plan in place for MTM services. The majority of PDPs perceived that MTM would have a moderate benefit to their organization. Most PDPs planned to focus efforts on diabetes, heart failure, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Overwhelmingly, PDPs planned to follow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate for criteria regarding beneficiary eligibility. Only 8.2% of respondents planned to use a "traditional" pharmacist, such as a community, long-term care, hospital, or clinic pharmacist. The majority of PDPs (53.6%) planned to employ managed care pharmacists to administer MTM services. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are eager to implement MTM services and are looking for PDPs to provide a path of implementation and reimbursement. Many PDPs were planning to deliver MTM services internally using health professional staff, thereby limiting the extent of participation of community, long-term care, hospital and health-system, and clinic-based pharmacists. Further research and advocacy are required to ensure that MTM services accomplish the true intent of the congressional and CMS mandates.
ST Boyd, LC Boyd, AJ Zillich
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preliminary development and implementation plans for medication therapy management (MTM) services across plan sponsors for the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs) and provide pharmacists with insights for MTM development. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 307 individual contacts from Medicare Advantage or stand-alone PDPs. INTERVENTION: A survey comprising questions about the PDP demographics, plans and implementation, beneficiary eligibility criteria, scope of services, providers of services, and payment structure for MTM services was e-mailed and mailed in November 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and bivariate analysis of survey items. RESULTS: A total of 97 usable surveys were completed, a 31.5% response rate. Almost all respondents had a plan in place for MTM services. The majority of PDPs perceived that MTM would have a moderate benefit to their organization. Most PDPs planned to focus efforts on diabetes, heart failure, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Overwhelmingly, PDPs planned to follow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate for criteria regarding beneficiary eligibility. Only 8.2% of respondents planned to use a "traditional" pharmacist, such as a community, long-term care, hospital, or clinic pharmacist. The majority of PDPs (53.6%) planned to employ managed care pharmacists to administer MTM services. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are eager to implement MTM services and are looking for PDPs to provide a path of implementation and reimbursement. Many PDPs were planning to deliver MTM services internally using health professional staff, thereby limiting the extent of participation of community, long-term care, hospital and health-system, and clinic-based pharmacists. Further research and advocacy are required to ensure that MTM services accomplish the true intent of the congressional and CMS mandates.
ST Boyd, LC Boyd, AJ Zillich
Medication therapy management survey of the prescription drug plans.
Medicare News, Syndicated
Comments Off
Aug 042007
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003), Vol. 46, No. 6. (c 2006), pp. 692-699.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preliminary development and implementation plans for medication therapy management (MTM) services across plan sponsors for the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs) and provide pharmacists with insights for MTM development. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 307 individual contacts from Medicare Advantage or stand-alone PDPs. INTERVENTION: A survey comprising questions about the PDP demographics, plans and implementation, beneficiary eligibility criteria, scope of services, providers of services, and payment structure for MTM services was e-mailed and mailed in November 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and bivariate analysis of survey items. RESULTS: A total of 97 usable surveys were completed, a 31.5% response rate. Almost all respondents had a plan in place for MTM services. The majority of PDPs perceived that MTM would have a moderate benefit to their organization. Most PDPs planned to focus efforts on diabetes, heart failure, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Overwhelmingly, PDPs planned to follow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate for criteria regarding beneficiary eligibility. Only 8.2% of respondents planned to use a "traditional" pharmacist, such as a community, long-term care, hospital, or clinic pharmacist. The majority of PDPs (53.6%) planned to employ managed care pharmacists to administer MTM services. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are eager to implement MTM services and are looking for PDPs to provide a path of implementation and reimbursement. Many PDPs were planning to deliver MTM services internally using health professional staff, thereby limiting the extent of participation of community, long-term care, hospital and health-system, and clinic-based pharmacists. Further research and advocacy are required to ensure that MTM services accomplish the true intent of the congressional and CMS mandates.
ST Boyd, LC Boyd, AJ Zillich
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the preliminary development and implementation plans for medication therapy management (MTM) services across plan sponsors for the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs) and provide pharmacists with insights for MTM development. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: 307 individual contacts from Medicare Advantage or stand-alone PDPs. INTERVENTION: A survey comprising questions about the PDP demographics, plans and implementation, beneficiary eligibility criteria, scope of services, providers of services, and payment structure for MTM services was e-mailed and mailed in November 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive and bivariate analysis of survey items. RESULTS: A total of 97 usable surveys were completed, a 31.5% response rate. Almost all respondents had a plan in place for MTM services. The majority of PDPs perceived that MTM would have a moderate benefit to their organization. Most PDPs planned to focus efforts on diabetes, heart failure, and other forms of cardiovascular disease. Overwhelmingly, PDPs planned to follow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandate for criteria regarding beneficiary eligibility. Only 8.2% of respondents planned to use a "traditional" pharmacist, such as a community, long-term care, hospital, or clinic pharmacist. The majority of PDPs (53.6%) planned to employ managed care pharmacists to administer MTM services. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are eager to implement MTM services and are looking for PDPs to provide a path of implementation and reimbursement. Many PDPs were planning to deliver MTM services internally using health professional staff, thereby limiting the extent of participation of community, long-term care, hospital and health-system, and clinic-based pharmacists. Further research and advocacy are required to ensure that MTM services accomplish the true intent of the congressional and CMS mandates.
ST Boyd, LC Boyd, AJ Zillich
Medicare Part D: selected issues for pharmacists and beneficiaries in 2007.
Medicare News, Syndicated
Comments Off
Aug 042007
J Manag Care Pharm, Vol. 13, No. 1. (b 2007), pp. 59-65.
BACKGROUND: Upon signing the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) on December 8, 2003, President Bush set in motion the greatest change in the Medicare program since its inception in 1965. MMA was implemented on January 1, 2006, and established the Medicare prescription drug benefit, also known as Medicare Part D. Community and managed care pharmacists were essential to the success in 2006 of this new benefit program with 33 million beneficiaries. Pharmacists will continue to be an essential and integral part of the continued success of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007, in part by being informed about the policies and regulations. OBJECTIVE: To review policy statements released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2006 and to compile an abridged version of the highlights from the policy statements that may affect pharmacists and their interaction with Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We reviewed all policy statements that were released publicly via the CMS Web site (www.cms.gov) policy guidance section between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2006. We read through approximately 100 guidance statements and summarized approximately 50 that were determined to be relevant to beneficiaries and pharmacists in various practice settings. RESULTS: Policy statements that may impact beneficiaries of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the timeline for the annual coordinated election period, managed care open enrollment period, and distribution of annual notices of change to beneficiaries. Changes have also occurred in the standard benefit and cost sharing for low-income subsidy (LIS) or extra help that some beneficiaries are eligible to receive based on their current financial status. Discontinuation of coverage of erectile dysfunction drugs is a noteworthy coverage change. For all health care providers, the National Provider Identification (NPI) number will be used beginning May 23, 2007. Once the system using NPI numbers is required, no other provider identification number will be valid for billing Medicare and Medicaid. CONCLUSION: Important policy updates to the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the subject areas of: (1) beneficiary enrollment, (2) transition medication fills, (3) standard benefit, (4) cost sharing, particularly for those who qualify for LIS, (5) enhancement of the Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Finder, (6) beneficiary complaints, (7) discontinuation of coverage for erectile dysfunction drugs, (8) vaccine coverage by the Medicare prescription drug benefit, (9) syringes in long-term care, (10) donation of unused medications by beneficiaries, (11) implementation of the NPI, and (12) preventive services covered by the Medicare program.
J Kilian, J Stubbings
BACKGROUND: Upon signing the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) on December 8, 2003, President Bush set in motion the greatest change in the Medicare program since its inception in 1965. MMA was implemented on January 1, 2006, and established the Medicare prescription drug benefit, also known as Medicare Part D. Community and managed care pharmacists were essential to the success in 2006 of this new benefit program with 33 million beneficiaries. Pharmacists will continue to be an essential and integral part of the continued success of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007, in part by being informed about the policies and regulations. OBJECTIVE: To review policy statements released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2006 and to compile an abridged version of the highlights from the policy statements that may affect pharmacists and their interaction with Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We reviewed all policy statements that were released publicly via the CMS Web site (www.cms.gov) policy guidance section between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2006. We read through approximately 100 guidance statements and summarized approximately 50 that were determined to be relevant to beneficiaries and pharmacists in various practice settings. RESULTS: Policy statements that may impact beneficiaries of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the timeline for the annual coordinated election period, managed care open enrollment period, and distribution of annual notices of change to beneficiaries. Changes have also occurred in the standard benefit and cost sharing for low-income subsidy (LIS) or extra help that some beneficiaries are eligible to receive based on their current financial status. Discontinuation of coverage of erectile dysfunction drugs is a noteworthy coverage change. For all health care providers, the National Provider Identification (NPI) number will be used beginning May 23, 2007. Once the system using NPI numbers is required, no other provider identification number will be valid for billing Medicare and Medicaid. CONCLUSION: Important policy updates to the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the subject areas of: (1) beneficiary enrollment, (2) transition medication fills, (3) standard benefit, (4) cost sharing, particularly for those who qualify for LIS, (5) enhancement of the Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Finder, (6) beneficiary complaints, (7) discontinuation of coverage for erectile dysfunction drugs, (8) vaccine coverage by the Medicare prescription drug benefit, (9) syringes in long-term care, (10) donation of unused medications by beneficiaries, (11) implementation of the NPI, and (12) preventive services covered by the Medicare program.
J Kilian, J Stubbings
Medicare Part D: selected issues for pharmacists and beneficiaries in 2007.
Medicare News, Syndicated
Comments Off
Aug 042007
J Manag Care Pharm, Vol. 13, No. 1. (b 2007), pp. 59-65.
BACKGROUND: Upon signing the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) on December 8, 2003, President Bush set in motion the greatest change in the Medicare program since its inception in 1965. MMA was implemented on January 1, 2006, and established the Medicare prescription drug benefit, also known as Medicare Part D. Community and managed care pharmacists were essential to the success in 2006 of this new benefit program with 33 million beneficiaries. Pharmacists will continue to be an essential and integral part of the continued success of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007, in part by being informed about the policies and regulations. OBJECTIVE: To review policy statements released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2006 and to compile an abridged version of the highlights from the policy statements that may affect pharmacists and their interaction with Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We reviewed all policy statements that were released publicly via the CMS Web site (www.cms.gov) policy guidance section between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2006. We read through approximately 100 guidance statements and summarized approximately 50 that were determined to be relevant to beneficiaries and pharmacists in various practice settings. RESULTS: Policy statements that may impact beneficiaries of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the timeline for the annual coordinated election period, managed care open enrollment period, and distribution of annual notices of change to beneficiaries. Changes have also occurred in the standard benefit and cost sharing for low-income subsidy (LIS) or extra help that some beneficiaries are eligible to receive based on their current financial status. Discontinuation of coverage of erectile dysfunction drugs is a noteworthy coverage change. For all health care providers, the National Provider Identification (NPI) number will be used beginning May 23, 2007. Once the system using NPI numbers is required, no other provider identification number will be valid for billing Medicare and Medicaid. CONCLUSION: Important policy updates to the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the subject areas of: (1) beneficiary enrollment, (2) transition medication fills, (3) standard benefit, (4) cost sharing, particularly for those who qualify for LIS, (5) enhancement of the Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Finder, (6) beneficiary complaints, (7) discontinuation of coverage for erectile dysfunction drugs, (8) vaccine coverage by the Medicare prescription drug benefit, (9) syringes in long-term care, (10) donation of unused medications by beneficiaries, (11) implementation of the NPI, and (12) preventive services covered by the Medicare program.
J Kilian, J Stubbings
BACKGROUND: Upon signing the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) on December 8, 2003, President Bush set in motion the greatest change in the Medicare program since its inception in 1965. MMA was implemented on January 1, 2006, and established the Medicare prescription drug benefit, also known as Medicare Part D. Community and managed care pharmacists were essential to the success in 2006 of this new benefit program with 33 million beneficiaries. Pharmacists will continue to be an essential and integral part of the continued success of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007, in part by being informed about the policies and regulations. OBJECTIVE: To review policy statements released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2006 and to compile an abridged version of the highlights from the policy statements that may affect pharmacists and their interaction with Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We reviewed all policy statements that were released publicly via the CMS Web site (www.cms.gov) policy guidance section between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2006. We read through approximately 100 guidance statements and summarized approximately 50 that were determined to be relevant to beneficiaries and pharmacists in various practice settings. RESULTS: Policy statements that may impact beneficiaries of the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the timeline for the annual coordinated election period, managed care open enrollment period, and distribution of annual notices of change to beneficiaries. Changes have also occurred in the standard benefit and cost sharing for low-income subsidy (LIS) or extra help that some beneficiaries are eligible to receive based on their current financial status. Discontinuation of coverage of erectile dysfunction drugs is a noteworthy coverage change. For all health care providers, the National Provider Identification (NPI) number will be used beginning May 23, 2007. Once the system using NPI numbers is required, no other provider identification number will be valid for billing Medicare and Medicaid. CONCLUSION: Important policy updates to the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2007 include the subject areas of: (1) beneficiary enrollment, (2) transition medication fills, (3) standard benefit, (4) cost sharing, particularly for those who qualify for LIS, (5) enhancement of the Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Finder, (6) beneficiary complaints, (7) discontinuation of coverage for erectile dysfunction drugs, (8) vaccine coverage by the Medicare prescription drug benefit, (9) syringes in long-term care, (10) donation of unused medications by beneficiaries, (11) implementation of the NPI, and (12) preventive services covered by the Medicare program.
J Kilian, J Stubbings
Recent Comments